Original Research

Validation of the Whooley questions for antenatal depression and anxiety among low-income women in urban South Africa

Carina Marsay, Lenore Manderson, Ugasvaree Subramaney
South African Journal of Psychiatry | Vol 23 | a1013 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v23i0.1013 | © 2017 Carina Marsay, Lenore Manderson, Ugasvaree Subramaney | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 02 June 2016 | Published: 11 April 2017

About the author(s)

Carina Marsay, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Lenore Manderson, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand,, South Africa
Ugasvaree Subramaney, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa and Sterkfontein Hospital, South Africa

Abstract

Background/objective: In South Africa, approximately 40% of women suffer from depression during pregnancy. Although perinatal depression and anxiety are significant public health problems impacting maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, no routine mental health screening programmes exist in the country. A practical, accurate screening tool is needed to identify cases in these busy, resource-scarce settings.

Method: A convenience sample of 145 women between 22 and 28 weeks gestation was recruited from Rahima Moosa Hospital antenatal clinic in Johannesburg. All women completed a biographical interview, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Whooley questions and a structured clinical interview.

Results: The results demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the Whooley questions and the EPDS in identifying depression, anxiety and stress disorders of varying severity. The importance of personal, social and cultural context in influencing the content and expression of these common perinatal conditions was also identified.

Discussion and conclusion: The validity of the Whooley questions in the context of urban South Africa, and the importance of ensuring clinical interviews to supplement any screening tools, is emphasised.


Keywords

perinatal depression; screening; South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5510
Total article views: 8197

 

Crossref Citations

1. Perinatal depression screening by health cadres in Indonesia: EPDS or Whooley?
Endang Retno Surjaningrum, Edi Dwi Riyanto, Junaidah Yusof, Husnual Mujahadah
Journal of Public Mental Health  vol: 23  issue: 3  first page: 264  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1108/JPMH-03-2024-0035

2. Comparison of mental health screening tools for detecting antenatal depression and anxiety disorders in South African women
Thandi van Heyningen, Simone Honikman, Mark Tomlinson, Sally Field, Landon Myer, Phillipa J. Hay
PLOS ONE  vol: 13  issue: 4  first page: e0193697  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193697

3. A systematic review of validated screening tools for anxiety disorders and PTSD in low to middle income countries
Anisa Y. Mughal, Jackson Devadas, Eric Ardman, Brooke Levis, Vivian F. Go, Bradley N. Gaynes
BMC Psychiatry  vol: 20  issue: 1  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02753-3

4. Prevalence, risk and protective factors of postpartum depression and anxiety symptoms in the Allada district, Benin
Maram Youshaa, Judith van der Waerden, Roméo Zoumenou, Achille Massougbodji, Michael J. Boivin, Florence Bodeau-Livinec, Ketevan Marr
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02982-5

5. Women’s interpretation, understanding and attribution of the anhedonia question in the PHQ-4 and modified-Whooley questions in the antenatal period
Stephen Matthey, Joanne Robinson, Anna Maria Della Vedova
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology  vol: 41  issue: 3  first page: 330  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.2000592

6. Perinatal anxiety disorders screening study: a study protocol
Nichole Fairbrother, Bryn Stagg, Olivia Scoten, Cora Keeney, Claudia Cargnelli
BMC Psychiatry  vol: 24  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05575-9

7. Is pregnancy-specific anxiety more enduring than general anxiety using self-report measures? A short-term longitudinal study
Stephen Matthey, Kay Souter
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology  vol: 37  issue: 4  first page: 384  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1578869

8. The Prevalence of Depression Symptoms among Pregnant Women during the Second Wave of COVID-19
Dewi Nirmala Sari, Hervita Diatri, Kemal Siregar, Hadi Pratomo
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences  vol: 10  issue: E  first page: 546  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.8255

9. The development of an ultra-short, maternal mental health screening tool in South Africa
T. van Heyningen, L. Myer, M. Tomlinson, S. Field, S. Honikman
Global Mental Health  vol: 6  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1017/gmh.2019.21

10. Adaptation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the Indonesian Version: Self-reported Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Pregnant WomenAdaptation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the Indonesian Version: Self-reported Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Pregnant Women
Dewi Nirmala Sari, Hervita Diatri, Kemal Siregar, Hadi Pratomo
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences  vol: 9  issue: B  first page: 1654  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.7783

11. The prevalence of anxiety in pregnant women at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Lisha Narayan, Corinne T. Johnson, Carina Y. Marsay
South African Journal of Psychiatry  vol: 30  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2250