About the Author(s)


Maya Jaffer Email symbol
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Laila Paruk symbol
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Belinda Marais symbol
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Citation


Jaffer M, Paruk L, Marais B. South African mental health workers’ knowledge and attitudes to trans and gender-diverse people. S Afr J Psychiat. 2026;32(0), a2513. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v32i0.2513

Original Research

South African mental health workers’ knowledge and attitudes to trans and gender-diverse people

Maya Jaffer, Laila Paruk, Belinda Marais

Received: 01 Apr. 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov. 2025; Published: 04 Feb. 2026

Copyright: © 2026. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

Background: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience higher rates of mental illness compared to cisgender populations. Accessing appropriate care remains challenging because of discrimination and a lack of provider knowledge. There is limited evidence exploring mental health worker views in a local setting.

Aim: This study aimed to explore knowledge and attitudes of South African mental health workers in specialised psychiatric settings towards TGD people.

Setting: This study was conducted at two specialist tertiary psychiatric hospitals in Johannesburg.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study utilising the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale was conducted among 150 mental health workers. Information on socio-demographic features, professional characteristics, and work experience was collected and analysed in relation to T-KAB scores.

Results: Participants demonstrated moderately favourable attitudes with a mean T-KAB score of 2.81/4.00. Professional category significantly influenced attitudes, with psychologists followed by medical doctors scoring the highest, and nurses and social workers scoring lowest. Age, sexual orientation, and religious affiliation were significantly associated with T-KAB scores, while years of practice, previous training in TGD-related care, and prior exposure to TGD patients showed no associations.

Conclusion: Mental health professionals in South African psychiatric hospitals hold moderately positive attitudes towards TGD individuals, with significant variations across professional categories. Prior training and clinical exposure were not associated with attitudes.

Contribution: This study provides one of the first assessments of mental health worker attitudes towards TGD individuals in an African setting. Nurses constitute the majority of the workforce and demonstrate less favourable attitudes, which has implications for approaches to improve transgender-affirming mental healthcare in this setting.

Keywords: transgender healthcare; mental health worker attitudes; psychiatric setting; the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale; South Africa.

Introduction

Globally, sexual minority populations, including transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals, experience substantially higher rates of mental health issues compared to cisgender populations, such as depression, anxiety, suicidality and substance use disorders.1,2,3 This disproportionate mental health burden stems at least in part from experiences of discrimination, violence, and societal marginalisation, and is commonly attributed to the minority stress model, in which external stressors are transformed into internalised stressors, such as shame, which elevate mental health risks.3,4 Meta-analyses confirm that these challenges are substantial, with several studies revealing particularly high rates of major depressive disorders affecting up to one-third of TGD individuals.1,2,3 Similar problems are observed in South Africa, with studies reporting markedly high prevalence of mental health problems and psychological distress among TGD individuals.5,6 In a large community-led study in 2019, more than half of the participants classified as currently depressed, one-fifth reported severe anxiety, and two-thirds reported lifetime suicidality.5

Despite these high burdens, accessing mental health care is fraught with barriers. Many TGD individuals report concerns about being pathologised for their gender identity, previous experiences of discrimination in a health care setting, and other systemic issues of access such as affordability of services.7,8,9 A US-based study found that recognisably transgender individuals were twice as likely to report experiences of discrimination in mental healthcare settings.9 Local evidence in a South African setting confirms that discrimination in healthcare settings remains a pervasive issue, with patients frequently encountering stigma and moral judgement from providers and sometimes refusal of care.5,10 Poor understanding of TGD-specific issues may compromise clinical care, particularly as conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorders, personality disorders and eating disorders, have been found to be more prevalent than in cisgender individuals and may present uniquely in TGD populations.11,12 Inpatient psychiatric settings present a particularly important and understudied context for examining attitudes towards TGD individuals, as recent evidence suggests stigma manifests at multiple levels in these environments, from institutional policies and infrastructure to interpersonal interactions between staff and patients.13 Given this pervasive evidence on discrimination and barriers to care, understanding provider knowledge and attitudes towards TGD individuals is essential for improving mental healthcare access and quality.

While identifying negative attitudes is important, understanding positive provider attitudes is equally crucial, as they play a pivotal role in improving TGD mental health outcomes. Access to a transgender-inclusive provider has been shown to protect against depression and suicidality.14 Recent systematic reviews and studies robustly suggest that mental health workers generally endorse favourable attitudes towards TGD individuals,15,16,17,18,19 with socio-demographic factors such as younger age, being in a racial minority, female gender, non-religiosity, and personal acquaintance with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) or transgender individuals being linked to more positive attitudes.15,16,17,18,20,21 Implicit biases, which are harder to measure, may still negatively affect the care experience.17 However, most of this evidence comes from more developed settings, with limited research examining mental health worker attitudes in African psychiatric contexts.

Alongside socio-demographic determinants of attitudes, attention has been paid to potentially modifiable factors such as training in TGD healthcare and clinical exposure to TGD patients. Global evidence suggests that only a minority of mental health workers receive formal training in gender-affirming care during their studies, with most relying on self-directed learning and professional development opportunities accessed independently after qualifying.18,19,22 Evidence suggests that both clinical experience with and exposure to TGD patients can motivate mental health workers to seek further education and can result in more positive attitudes, although findings remain mixed.15,16 In addition, systematic reviews have suggested that greater curricular training time on LGBTQ issues has positive effects on knowledge and attitudes.15

Turning to the South African setting, a lack of training and preparedness in dealing with TGD issues is frequently cited by healthcare workers, with confidence in caring for patients from sexual minorities remaining low.10,23 Although South Africa has published progressive and comprehensive guidelines for gender-affirming care that affirm the important role of mental health providers in supporting TGD individuals,24 evidence on mental healthcare provision for this population in a local context remains scarce. Recent systematic reviews of educational interventions in transgender healthcare show promising but mixed results: while training initiatives generally demonstrate improvements in knowledge, attitudes and self-reported competence among healthcare workers, there is no consensus on best practices for education delivery, and limited evidence on long-term impacts.25

Addressing these challenges requires an understanding of local healthcare worker attitudes towards TGD patients. While international studies have examined mental health worker attitudes, there is a paucity of evidence from African psychiatric settings, where cultural contexts and training gaps may differ substantially. Identifying personal and professional factors associated with negative attitudes can inform targeted training initiatives and improve service delivery in local psychiatric settings. This study therefore aimed to address this gap in the evidence.

Aim and objectives

This study aimed to explore the knowledge and attitudes of South African mental health workers practising in a specialised psychiatric hospital setting towards TGD people.

The study objectives were:

  • Describe the knowledge and attitudes of mental health workers working in specialist psychiatric hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa towards TGD individuals.
  • Compare differences in knowledge and attitudes towards TGD individuals based on mental health worker demographic characteristics.
  • Compare differences in knowledge and attitudes towards TGD individuals based on mental health worker training and experience.

Research methods and design

Study design and setting

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at two specialised tertiary psychiatric hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa: Tara Hospital and Sterkfontein Hospital. Both hospitals are affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) academic circuit. Tara Hospital’s services include general adult psychiatry, neuropsychiatry, child and adolescent psychiatry, an eating disorder unit, and a psychotherapy unit, for both inpatients and outpatients. Sterkfontein Hospital provides general adult psychiatry inpatient services and has a forensic psychiatric unit and a dual diagnosis unit for patients with both substance use disorders and psychiatric disorders.

Sampling

The study population comprised mental health workers employed at Tara and Sterkfontein hospitals, including professional nurses, medical officers, psychiatry registrars, consultant psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, intern psychologists, occupational therapists (OT), and social workers. At the time of data collection, these hospitals together employed approximately 650 mental health workers across these disciplines. All students, including medical, psychology, and nursing, were excluded. A convenience sampling approach was used to recruit participants from the eligible clinical staff population.

Data collection and study measures

Data collection took place between June 2024 and November 2024. The survey was made available in both paper and electronic formats. Paper surveys were distributed at both hospitals with designated collection boxes for completed surveys. An electronic version of the survey, hosted on the REDCap data management platform, was distributed via email to clinical staff and could also be accessed through quick-response (QR) code links displayed on posters throughout both hospitals. Both formats were offered to maximise participation, anticipating potential participants may have different preferences for survey completion, but the content and presentation of questions were identical across formats. Participation was voluntary for all staff members.

The survey consisted of three sections: The first section collected socio-demographic information including participants’ age, gender, sexual orientation, religion and profession. The second section comprised the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale. The last section collected information on professional experience, including years in practice, any previously received training on providing services to transgender patients (without specification of training type, duration or content), and previous professional contact with transgender patients.

The T-KAB is a 22-item scale designed and validated to evaluate transgender-related knowledge, attitudes and beliefs across three domains: (1) acceptance and understanding of the gender spectrum (assessed by items 1, 2, 11, 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22), (2) social tolerance of transgender identity (assessed by items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 16 and 21), and (3) comfort and contact with transgender individuals (assessed by items 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15 and 17).26 The T-KAB scale was developed with expert input from transgender scholars, has demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity, and has thus far been validated in the United States of America, Mexico and Portugal.26,27,28 While the T-KAB has not been formally validated in South Africa, it has demonstrated good psychometric properties across different cultural contexts and was administered in English, which is widely used in South African healthcare settings. Items are assessed via a 1–4 Likert scale.26 Higher total scores indicate greater knowledge and more accepting attitudes and beliefs towards TGD individuals. Permission to use the scale was obtained from the authors prior to commencement of this study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.0.0; www.R-project.org). Categorical data were reported as counts and percentages, and continuous data were reported as mean and standard deviation (s.d.). The fixed variables were all categorical, and comparisons of the components within each variable were analysed with Pearson’s chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests to assess whether the components differed from chance (i.e., a null model). Comparisons of the T-KAB scores for socio-demographic variables and for professional training and experience were analysed using Mann–Whitney U tests (k = 2 levels) or Kruskal–Wallis tests (k > 2 levels). Pairwise post hoc tests (with Bonferroni adjustments) were conducted following significant Kruskal–Wallis tests. Model significance was set at 0.05 and tests were two-tailed.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number M240506-C-0001), and permission to conduct the study was obtained from the research committees of both Tara Hospital and Sterkfontein Hospital. Participation in the survey was voluntary, and all responses were anonymous, with no identifying information collected. There were no direct benefits for participants, and relevant information was provided on accessing psychological support if required for distress caused by completing the survey.

Results

Socio-demographic, professional and work experience characteristics of participants

A total of 150 mental healthcare workers participated in the study. All healthcare workers did not answer all socio-demographic or work experience questions in the study; in these few cases, the missing data were not considered in statistical analyses. There was a similar distribution between the two study sites: Sterkfontein Hospital (n = 79; 52.7%) and Tara Hospital (n = 68; 45.3%). Nurses (n = 92; 61.3%), followed by doctors (n = 41; 27.3%), comprised the majority of the study sample, with most respondents being 18–34 years old (n = 64; 42.7%). The socio-demographic and professional characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Details on the professional work and training experience of the study participants are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 1: Socio-demographic and professional characteristics of mental health workers from Tara and Sterkfontein Hospitals who participated in the study.
TABLE 2: Professional work and training experience of mental health workers from Tara and Sterkfontein Hospitals who participated in the study.
Knowledge and attitudes of study participants towards transgender and gender-diverse individuals
Transgender knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs scores

On a scale of 1–4, with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes and beliefs towards TGD individuals, the mean T-KAB score among the study participants was 2.81 (s.d. ±0.71) for all 22 items of the T-KAB. In terms of the three domain subscales, the mean score was 2.57 (s.d. ±0.84) for the gender spectrum acceptance domain; 2.86 (s.d. ±0.81) for the social tolerance domain; and 2.87 (s.d. ±0.69) for the comfort and contact domain.

Factors associated with transgender knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs and domain scores

Analysis of socio-demographic characteristics revealed several significant associations with T-KAB scores in terms of age, sexual orientation and religious affiliation, but not gender identity. Professional category was also found to be significantly associated with all T-KAB measures (total score and domain scores), with psychologists showing the highest scores, followed by medical doctors, while nurses and social workers scored the lowest among the study participants. Professional work experience factors, including years of practice, previous training in transgender mental healthcare, and clinical exposure via having previously provided services to transgender patients, showed no significant associations with T-KAB scores. The relationship between T-KAB scores and socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants is shown in Table 3 and the relationship between T-KAB scores and professional, work and training experience is shown in Table 4.

TABLE 3: Relationship between the socio-demographic characteristics and transgender knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs scores (overall and domain) of mental health workers from Tara and Sterkfontein Hospitals who participated in the study.
TABLE 4: Relationship between professional work and training experience and transgender knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs scores (overall and domain) of mental health workers from Tara and Sterkfontein Hospitals who participated in the study.

Discussion

This study found moderately favourable attitudes towards TGD individuals among mental health workers at two South African psychiatric hospitals. This finding is encouraging and noteworthy, representing one of very few studies examining the attitudes of mental health professionals towards TGD individuals in the Global South. Our mean T-KAB score of 2.81 is equivalent, or only slightly lower than those reported by several other studies using the T-KAB scale in groups of healthcare trainees and professionals in the United States that have reported mean total scores in the range of 2.89 to 3.61.29,30,31

Professional category emerged as a significant factor, with clinical psychologists and medical doctors demonstrating higher scores than nurses and social workers on the T-KAB scale. This finding has particular significance given that nurses constitute the majority of the mental health workforce and play a crucial role in both direct patient care and shaping institutional culture. Recent systematic review evidence highlights nurses’ critical role in shaping unit dynamics and patient experiences in inpatient psychiatric settings because of their constant presence and influence over the therapeutic environment.13 The attitudes and practices of nursing staff are therefore instrumental in determining patient experiences and establishing the overall environment of mental healthcare facilities.

Lower scores in the gender spectrum acceptance domain compared to social tolerance and comfort domains may reflect challenges with understanding gender diversity beyond traditional binary constructs. Notably, this domain relates more to underlying knowledge of gender constructs rather than attitudes towards individuals, suggesting potential benefit from educational interventions that specifically address these concepts.

The associations found between attitudes and personal characteristics such as age, sexual orientation, and religious affiliation align with previous research, which has also shown associations between younger ages, LGBTQIA+ identity and non-religiosity with more positive attitudes.15,17,18,30 The lack of association between attitudes and professional factors such as years of experience, previous training, or clinical exposure to transgender patients may reflect the mixed evidence in the literature on these relationships.15,16 Although there has been some evidence from systematic reviews that greater curricular training time may positively influence both knowledge and attitudes,15 our study found no significant associations between training and attitudes towards TGD patients. This discrepancy may reflect methodological differences in how these factors were measured or could suggest that other variables may be more influential in our specific setting. This finding should be interpreted in the light of recent systematic review evidence noting the lack of data on long-term impacts of educational interventions.25 In addition, we did not collect detailed information about the type and content of previous training our participants received, which the literature suggests can vary substantially. Further research should examine which training approaches are most effective for producing sustained improvements in attitudes and knowledge.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths, including the use of a standardised instrument to assess attitudes, and the inclusion of multiple professional categories across two psychiatric hospitals. To our knowledge, this represents one of the first assessments of mental health worker attitudes towards TGD individuals in an African psychiatric setting.

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings. The study measured only explicit, self-reported attitudes, which may be influenced by social desirability bias and may not capture implicit biases that could affect patient care. The small sample size, cross-sectional nature of the study, and convenience sampling approach limit causal inference and generalisability. In particular, the very small numbers of allied health professionals (including psychologists, OTs and social workers) limited meaningful conclusions about these professional groups. In addition, the study may be affected by non-response bias, as those with more negative attitudes towards transgender individuals might have been less likely to participate in the survey. The T-KAB scale has not been formally validated in a South African context, which may affect the interpretation of scores, although it has been validated in multiple countries and contexts and is administered in English, which is the primary language of professional practice in South African psychiatric hospitals. Furthermore, we did not collect detailed information about the type and content of previous TGD training our participants received, which the literature suggests can vary substantially. Further research should examine which training approaches are most effective for producing sustained improvements in attitudes and knowledge. Finally, while attitude surveys provide valuable insight into individual-level factors, they cannot capture broader structural and systemic barriers to gender-affirming care. Recent evidence suggests that improving care for TGD individuals requires addressing multiple levels of stigma, including structural barriers such as institutional policies.13 The focus on individual attitudes, while important, should not detract from examining and addressing institutional and systemic factors that may impact access to inclusive mental healthcare.

Recommendations

Further research is needed to understand effective approaches to improving knowledge and attitudes among mental health workers, particularly among nursing populations, and with a potential focus on educational interventions that address fundamental understanding of gender diversity. Future studies should also examine how individual attitudes interact with structural barriers in determining patient experiences of mental healthcare.

Conclusion

This study reveals moderately positive attitudes towards TGD individuals among South African mental health workers, with important variations across professional categories that have implications for training. Future efforts should focus on improving understanding of gender diversity concepts, particularly among nursing staff who constitute the majority of the mental health workforce and play a crucial role in shaping patients’ experiences in psychiatric settings.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the staff at Tara Hospital and Sterkfontein Hospital for their participation in this study, and to the Department of Psychiatry at the University of the Witwatersrand for their support throughout this project. They would like to particularly acknowledge Dr Felicity Marcus, for her support and her valuable contributions to the development of the research protocol during the initial stages of this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

CRediT authorship contribution

Maya Jaffer: Conceptualisation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Visualisation, Writing – original draft. Laila Paruk: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Belinda Marais: Supervision, Visualisation, Writing – review & editing. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication, and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.

Funding information

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Maya Jaffer, upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.

References

  1. Reisner SL, Poteat T, Keatley J, et al. Global health burden and needs of transgender populations: A review. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):412–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00684-X
  2. Plöderl M, Tremblay P. Mental health of sexual minorities. A systematic review. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(5):367–385. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1083949
  3. Valentine SE, Shipherd JC. A systematic review of social stress and mental health among transgender and gender non-conforming people in the United States. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;66:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.003
  4. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
  5. Müller A, Daskilewicz K. Are we doing alright? Realities of violence, mental health, and access to healthcare related to sexual orientation and gender identity and expression in East and Southern Africa: Research report based on a community led study in nine countries. Amsterdam: COC Netherlands; 2019.
  6. Campbell MM, Fresán A, Addinall RM, et al. Experiences of gender incongruence and the relationship between social exclusion, psychological distress, and dysfunction among South African transgender adults: A field-study for ICD-11. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2018;30(3):168–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/104012371803000301
  7. Snow A, Cerel J, Loeffler DN, Flaherty C. Barriers to mental health care for transgender and gender-nonconforming adults: A systematic literature review. Health Soc Work. 2019;44(3):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlz016
  8. Holt NR, Hope DA, Mocarski R, Woodruff N. The often-circuitous path to affirming mental health care for transgender and gender-diverse adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023;25(3):105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01410-2
  9. Rodriguez A, Agardh A, Asamoah BO. Self-reported discrimination in health-care settings based on recognizability as transgender: A cross-sectional study among transgender US citizens. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:973–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1028-z
  10. Luvuno Z, Ncama B, Mchunu G. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care workers related to treatment and care of transgender patients: A qualitative study in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Gend Behav. 2017;15(2):8694–8706.
  11. Zimmerman M, Benjamin I, Seijas-Rodriguez C. Psychiatric diagnoses among transgender and gender diverse patients compared to cisgender patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(6):43020. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14062
  12. Coelho JS, Suen J, Clark BA, Marshall SK, Geller J, Lam PY. Eating disorder diagnoses and symptom presentation in transgender youth: A scoping review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1097-x
  13. Clark KD, Jewell J, Sherman AD, Balthazar MS, Murray SB, Bosse JD. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people’s experiences of stigma across the spectrum of inpatient psychiatric care: A systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024;34(1):e13455. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13455
  14. Kattari SK, Walls NE, Speer SR, Kattari L. Exploring the relationship between transgender-inclusive providers and mental health outcomes among transgender/gender variant people. Soc Work Health Care. 2016;55(8):635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2016.1193099
  15. Cruciani G, Quintigliano M, Mezzalira S, Scandurra C, Carone N. Attitudes and knowledge of mental health practitioners towards LGBTQ+ patients: A mixed-method systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2024;113:102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102488
  16. Cutillas-Fernández MA, Jiménez-Barbero JA, Herrera-Giménez M, Forcén-Muñoz LA, Jiménez-Ruiz I. Attitudes and beliefs of mental health professionals towards trans people: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(15): 6495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156495
  17. Brown S, Kucharska J, Marczak M. Mental health practitioners’ attitudes towards transgender people: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Transgenderism. 2018;19(1):4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1374227
  18. Riggs DW, Bartholomaeus C. Australian mental health nurses and transgender clients: Attitudes and knowledge. J Res Nurs. 2016;21(3):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987115624483
  19. Stryker SD, Pallerla H, Yockey RA, Bedard-Thomas J, Pickle S. Training mental health professionals in gender-affirming care: A survey of experienced clinicians. Transgend Health. 2022;7(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0123
  20. Rowan SP, Lilly CL, Shapiro RE, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of health care providers toward transgender patients within a rural tertiary care center. Transgend Health. 2019;4(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2018.0050
  21. Jain H, Subramanian K, Gowsi K, Sankaran A. Attitudes toward transgender persons among medical students of a tertiary health-care center: A cross-sectional exploratory study. J Psychosexual Health. 2022;4(3):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/26318318221107350
  22. Clark KA, Hughto JMW, Pachankis JE. ‘What’s the right thing to do?’ Correctional healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences caring for transgender inmates. Soc Sci Med. 2017;193:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.052
  23. Badat A, Moodley S, Paruk L. Preparedness of final year medical students in caring for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients with mental illness. S Afr J Psychiatry. 2023;29. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.1998
  24. Tomson A, McLachlan C, Wattrus C, et al. Southern African HIV clinicians’ society gender-affirming healthcare guideline for South Africa. S Afr J HIV Med. 2021;22(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1299
  25. Jecke L, Zepf F. Delivering transgender-specific knowledge and skills into health and allied health studies and training: A systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;33(5):1327–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-023-02195-8
  26. Clark KA, Hughto JM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2020;17:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00399-9
  27. Fresán A, Domínguez-Martínez T, Castilla-Peón MF, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale for the Mexican population. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(4):1959–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02259-3
  28. Carvalho SA, Lima M, Pascoal P. Sociopolitical trends and attitudes towards transgender people: A validation study of the transgender knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (T-KAB) scale in a Portuguese sample. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2024;22:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00981-w
  29. Martin A, Celentano J, Olezeski C, et al. Collaborating with transgender youth to educate healthcare trainees and professionals: Randomized controlled trial of a didactic enhanced by brief videos. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1): 2427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14791-5
  30. Buonaiuto K, Dodge E, Aboul-Enein BH. Registered dietitian nutritionists’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding nutrition for the transgender population in three New England states: A cross-sectional study. J Immigr Minor Health. 2023;25(4):841–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-023-01484-3
  31. Linsenmeyer W, Stiles D, Drallmeier T, et al. Advancing inclusion of transgender identities in health professional education programs: The interprofessional transgender health education day. J Allied Health. 2023;52(1):24–35.


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.