Original Research

Motivational interviewing for substance use among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Amy S. Adams, Taryn Williams, Dan J. Stein, Goodman Sibeko, Steven Shoptaw, Stephen Rollnick
South African Journal of Psychiatry | Vol 32 | a2555 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v32i0.2555 | © 2026 Amy S. Adams, Taryn Williams, Dan J. Stein, Goodman Sibeko, Steven Shoptaw, Stephen Rollnick | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 19 June 2025 | Published: 13 May 2026

About the author(s)

Amy S. Adams, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Taryn Williams, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Dan J. Stein, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Goodman Sibeko, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Steven Shoptaw, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
Stephen Rollnick, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Harmful substance use (HSU) poses a significant global health challenge, impacting social, economic, and healthcare systems. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are particularly burdened as a result of limited infrastructure for managing substance-related issues. While evidence-based brief interventions like motivational interviewing (MI) are widely used in high-income countries, research on their effectiveness in LMICs is limited.
Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate studies employing MI as part of interventions for adults with HSU in LMIC settings.
Setting: This review focused on studies within low- and middle-income countries which include settings characterised by constrained mental health resources, high treatment gaps for substance use disorders (SUDs), and diverse service delivery contexts.
Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov and GSK Clinical Study Register for publications from 2010 to 2022. A narrative analysis was conducted, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools assessed study quality.
Results: Out of 518 publications, 11 studies from five countries met our inclusion criteria. Most were randomised controlled trials, with some using qualitative or mixed methods. The interventions targeted alcohol, opioids, and other drugs. Different strategies were used, including MI-blended with other interventions (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy, behavioural activation, and imaginal desensitisation) or using MI-informed approaches.
Conclusion: Overall, MI-informed interventions were shown to improve substance use outcomes in six of the 11 studies, with a significant reduction in substance use. However, further high-quality research with larger samples and rigorous designs is needed to strengthen the evidence base and address potential sources of bias.
Contribution: Findings suggest that MI-informed approaches, as a brief intervention, can improve substance use outcomes in resource-constrained environments within LMICs.


Keywords

motivational interviewing; motivational interviewing-informed interventions; substance use disorders; LMICs; addiction; harmful substance use; cognitive-behavioural therapy; behavioural activation; imaginal desensitisation

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 461
Total article views: 588


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.