Original Research

Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003

F J W Calitz, P H J J van Rensburg, P P de Jager, M L Olander, L Thomas, R Venter, G A Wessels, G Joubert
South African Journal of Psychiatry | Vol 13, No 4 | a37 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v13i4.37 | © 2007 F J W Calitz, P H J J van Rensburg, P P de Jager, M L Olander, L Thomas, R Venter, G A Wessels, G Joubert | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 08 January 2008 | Published: 01 December 2007

About the author(s)

F J W Calitz,
P H J J van Rensburg,
P P de Jager,
M L Olander,
L Thomas,
R Venter,
G A Wessels, Department of Psychiatry, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein
G Joubert, Department of Biostatistics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Full Text:



Background. Increased crime is a problem in South Africaand complications arise when the accused is intellectuallydisabled. The accountability and fitness to stand trial ofsuch individuals is an important facet that needs to bemanaged by the judicial and health systems.Objective. To analyse the accountability and triability ofintellectually disabled people awaiting trial referred tothe Free State Psychiatric Complex (FSPC) from 1993 to2003 according to Sections 77 and 78 of the CriminalProcedures Act (Act 51 of 1977).Method. A retrospective study was conducted. The studypopulation consisted of 80 intellectually disabled peopleawaiting trial in the Free State, referred to the FSPC. Thereason for referral was the possibility that they were nottriable or accountable. A data form was compiled totransfer the relevant information from the patients’ clinicalfiles.Results. The study found that the majority of subjectswere male (96.3%), unmarried (76.3%) and unemployed(63.8%). The median age was 27 years. A relativelyhigh percentage (49%) had received some schoolingand 16% had attended a special school. Most (32%)were referred from the Bloemfontein area and 68% werereferred from the remainder of the Free State and otherareas. The majority were referred according to Sections77 and 78. The highest number of the offences were ofa sexual nature (78%). Of the subjects, 62 (62.5%) werediagnosed as having mild mental retardation, while 16%were diagnosed as having moderate mental retardation.A total of 71 (71.25%) were found to be untriable andunaccountable.Conclusion. Triability and accountability are not onlyreflected by IQ score, but also involve the accused’sunderstanding of his/her environment, his/her speechand language proficiency, level of education, reasoningability and the manner in which the crime was committed.It is important to note that having an IQ of 70 or less doesnot automatically mean that the accused is unfit to standtrial or is not accountable. It is possible for an intellectuallydisabled person to be triable, accountable or diminishedaccountable.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 2526
Total article views: 1487


Crossref Citations

1. The gendered context of women charged with violent offences in the forensic psychiatric setting
Mohammed Nagdee, Lillian Artz, Ugasvaree Subramaney, Charles Young, Amanda Pieterse, Julia Pettitt
South African Journal of Psychiatry  vol: 30  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2222