Original Research
Profile of rape victims referred by the court to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 2003 - 2009
Submitted: 15 May 2013 | Published: 30 April 2014
About the author(s)
F J W Calitz, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, South AfricaLoube de Ridder, MB ChB student, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, South Africa
Nandi Gericke, MB ChB student, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, South Africa
Anmarie Pretorius, MB ChB student, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, South Africa
Jaco Smit, MB ChB student, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Gina Joubert, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (594KB)Abstract
Background. The psychological evaluation of rape victims to determine their competency to testify in court and whether they are capable of consenting to sexual intercourse is challenging, especially when the rape victim is mentally retarded.
Objective. To describe the profile of mentally retarded rape victims referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex (FSPC) in Bloemfontein from 2003 to 2009.
Methods. A descriptive retrospective study was conducted. The study consisted of 137 rape victims referred by the court to the FSPC for psychological evaluation from 2003 to 2009. Patient files were used to obtain information.
Results. The majority of individuals (n=129; 94.2%) in the cohort were female. The mean age of the participants was 19 years (range 3 - 52). The number of victims evaluated increased from four in 2003 to 36 in 2009. Most participants were diagnosed with moderate (67.2%), followed by severe (18.3%) and mild (14.6%) mental retardation. Only two of the victims were able to give legal consent to sexual intercourse. Only one participant was able to testify in a court of law. A noteworthy finding was that in only 25 (18.2%) cases, a clinical psychologist was subpoenaed to testify in court.
Conclusion. The vast majority of mentally retarded rape victims in our cohort, regardless of their level of intellectual functioning, were not able to testify in court and were not able to give informed consent to sexual intercourse.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4462Total article views: 1674
Crossref Citations
1. Inequities in Forensic Mental Health in South Africa and Recommendations for Service Development
Anthony L. Pillay, Anne L. Kramers-Olen, W. Neil Gowensmith
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health vol: 22 issue: 4 first page: 326 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/14999013.2023.2243856