Original Research
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs
Submitted: 31 March 2010 | Published: 01 March 2011
About the author(s)
Isabelle Swanepoel, Dept of Psychiatry, Univ of Pretoria, South AfricaChrista Kruger, Dept of Psychiatry, Univ of Pretoria, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (122KB)Abstract
Background: The problem of enhancing validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development in the field of clinical psychology has been perpetuated by several factors. Societal biases and value judgements, a positivistic paradigm, and challenges associated with multiculturalism continually spill over into cross-cultural research methodology. An overemphasis on quantitative methods and insufficient exploration of the meaning of the concepts to be measured tend to threaten construct validity.
Objectives and Methods: This article tracks some of the progress in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development – prior to and since the International Test Commission Guidelines, and including the complex South African situation – to give support to the perspective that previous cross-cultural research inadequately equips contemporary researchers to develop valid tests for multicultural clinical contexts.
Results: A systems-informed paradigm shift is proposed, which involves the application of systemic concepts such as circularity, relationality, neutrality, and a concern with process issues. Ideally, multidisciplinary, multicultural test-developing teams that include members of the target-cultural group should consult and collaborate with the target groups before embarking on test-adaptation or test-development activities. Such teamwork would help to ensure that the meaning of the relevant concept/s is captured in a valid way for each cultural group. Furthermore, such collaboration should form a part of using qualitative research designs more frequently in clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development.
Conclusions: The emphasis should be on building theory and generating hypotheses, in order to pursue a deeper understanding of the constructs under investigation, and to advance theoretical developments in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3366Total article views: 3502
Crossref Citations
1. Cultural and Practice Perspectives on the Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Voices From American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start Programs
Jessica V. Barnes-Najor, Nicole L. Thompson, Ann F. Cameron, Teresa M. Smith, Mavany Calac Verdugo, Patricia Lee Brown, Michelle C. Sarche
Journal of Research in Childhood Education vol: 35 issue: 1 first page: 162 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/02568543.2020.1723749